TCCoA Forums banner

1 - 20 of 20 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,201 Posts
Since that article most likely wont stay around I copy/pasted it here

My rearview mirror exploded with blue and white lights. I glanced down at my speedometer -- I was pushing 80 mph. But the cars around me were going about the same speed. Could this cop really be pulling me over?

I carefully navigated my way across six lanes of traffic. I pulled over on the shoulder and waited, my heart pounding. Moments later the motorcycle cop's helmeted face appeared in the passenger window.

"License and registration," he said, raising his voice over the roar of the traffic.

"What's the problem?" I asked.

"You were doing 80 in a 65-mile-an-hour zone." He disappeared before I could argue the point.

Busted.

I sat there fuming, thinking of the money this would cost me, the increased insurance premiums or the cost and time to attend traffic school. And for what? Going 80 miles per hour on the 405 Freeway in Los Angeles where speeds routinely reach 80 and even soar into the 90s? No way was I a reckless driver, the kind you see threading the needle between a tractor-trailer truck and a school bus. Those guys deserved tickets, not me. Still, I was--

Busted.

When the cop returned I tried a few excuses on him.

Me: I was going with the flow of traffic.

Cop: You passed three cars while I was behind you.

Me: Maybe I was speeding, but I couldn't have been going 80 -- not in this little gas/electric hybrid Honda Insight.

Cop: I followed you for a half mile. If you had seen me and slowed down, I wouldn't ticket you.

Me: I'm vulnerable in this little car and need to keep up with traffic.

Cop: You should drive slower and more carefully in a small car.

Obviously, he'd heard it all. I signed the ticket with a shaky hand and surrendered to my fate. But wait! Other drivers at Edmunds.com had received tickets and beat them. I could do the same thing. I would fight my ticket.

A few days later, I shared this story with Walt Meyer, a friend of mine who is a freelance writer and also teaches at a comedy traffic school. I told him I was going to fight my ticket.

"You'll lose," he said.

"Why? I was going with the flow of traffic," I whined.

"Oh, so there was a road sign saying 'Go with the flow'?"

Jeez, and I thought he was my friend.

"If you really want to try to fight your ticket, read 'Beat the Cops' by Alex Carroll," Meyer said. "But you'll probably lose anyway."

I ordered the book through Carroll's Web site and read it. And for the first time since seeing those blue and white lights I felt a glimmer of hope. The book describes how the author got 16 tickets in a short time and was able to nullify 10 of them. He eventually wrote his book based on what he learned.

Even more interesting was the writer's perspective. Unlike traffic cops, who make you feel like a serial killer for speeding, the book states that the majority of tickets are issued to generate money for government municipalities. Insurance companies benefit from traffic tickets, too, raising your rates when your driving record shows a moving violation. The National Motorists Association claims that costly radar guns are donated to police departments by some insurance carriers to encourage them to write more speeding tickets.

Finally, I was getting somewhere in this process. I called Carroll and told him the details of my traffic stop.

"A speeding ticket based on pacing is the hardest kind to beat," he said.

"Pacing" is when a police officer follows you and checks your speed by looking at his speedometer. Speeding tickets can also be issued based on an officer "estimating" your speed -- this is nothing more than a cop watching you and guessing how fast you are going.

According to Carroll, there are three ways to beat a ticket:

1. The cop doesn't show up for court

2. You exploit a technicality (such as a problem with the patrol car's speedometer)

3. You have a good argument for extenuating circumstances (you are speeding to get your pregnant wife to the hospital)

This reminded me of a story a friend told me. He was driving down a canyon road when he struck a bird, which became lodged under the windshield wipers. His daughters were in the car with him and they began screaming hysterically. He sped up to dislodge the bird and, at that moment, was pulled over for speeding. When he told this bizarre story to a judge, the ticket was dismissed.

My pacing ticket didn't fall easily into any of Carroll's three categories. The only technical angle to exploit was to prove that my speedometer was malfunctioning. I spoke to Edmunds.com's technical editor and he told me the speedometer might in fact be wrong. My heart jumped. "I think it's actually a little low," he said.

Another tactic Carroll describes is to delay the trial to a time when the ticketing officer can't come to court. He suggested I call the station house where my California Highway Patrol officer was based and find out when he was on vacation, or what his days off were. This could be done by calling over a number of days to find out when he was working. Then, when I extended my court date, try to schedule it for a day that he wasn't on duty.

Other strategies might include requesting the officer's notes written on the back of the ticket hoping there is something there which is inaccurate.

I decided to extend the date of my trial to increase the chances the officer wouldn't appear in court. As I attempted to do this I made an alarming discovery. You can request only one postponement (called an "extension") and it must be requested 10 days before your trial date. This is stated in very small print on the ticket, and it doesn't really make sense. I mean, you're more apt to have a scheduling conflict arise at the last minute rather than 10 days earlier. But this is the way the law is written so I was committed to the assigned trial date.

However, I still had one ace in the hole. If the ticketing officer did show up, and my defense was falling on deaf ears, I could quote California Vehicle Code 41501 allowing me to attend traffic school. But -- and this was important -- I should make a photocopy of the law because some judges weren't familiar with it.

"If it looks like you're going to lose, say, 'Your honor, I see that you're very busy here. I will cite CVC 41501 and take traffic school,'" Meyer told me.

With this backup plan in mind I set about creating a reasonable sounding argument. But I had to get busy. My court date was in three days.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,201 Posts
Beat Your Ticket
Part Two -- Your Day in Traffic Court
By Edmunds.com Editors
Date Posted 02-15-2001
On the day of my trial for a speeding ticket I arrived outside traffic court in West Los Angeles to find about 30 people milling around, waiting for the doors to open. At the other end of the corridor, the police officers who had issued the tickets had gathered. I noticed that these two groups didn't mingle at all.

When the doors finally opened (45 minutes late) we all filed into the courtroom. The police officers sat on one side of the room while the ticketed motorists sat on the other.

I had prepared for my day in court in several ways:

I wore a coat and tie
I had read several books about presenting cases in traffic court
I had drawn a diagram of the area where the traffic stop occurred
I had copies of the California Vehicle Codes relevant to my case
The only thing I was lacking was a compelling argument to prove that I wasn't speeding. I mean, I was speeding and there were no real technicalities I could exploit to contradict that. My strategy was to wait until the last possible moment, hoping the ticketing officer didn't show up, and then, if he did make an appearance, invoke California Vehicle Code 41501 stating my right to go to traffic school.

The judge finally appeared and told us that he would be reading off our names. If we were prepared to proceed to trial, we should respond by saying, "Ready." The judge sternly warned us that this was our last chance to opt for traffic school. If we went to trial and lost, there would be points on our license. If we took traffic school now our sins would be forgiven.

Surveying the room, the judge then said to one of his clerks, "You know, I saw a lot of officers downstairs. Let them know we're starting now." The clerk disappeared. This, and several other comments showed that the judge was trying to scare us into taking traffic school rather than tying up the court with a trial.

The judge then began reading our names. In several cases, the defendant answered, "Ready," and the police officers responded by saying, "The people are ready." The judge set these case files to one side for trial. But in over half of the cases there was no response from the police. In other cases the police responded by saying, "Officer doesn't remember," and the case was dismissed.

In one case, the judge got no response when he called the police officer's name. He told his clerk, "Check downstairs. I know I saw the officer down there." This case file was set to one side, and the defender slouched in his seat, muttering an obscenity. The people whose cases were dismissed usually said, "All right!" and left the courtroom with a spring in their step.

When my name was called I responded with a confident, "Ready!" The judge then called out the police officer's name. I held my breath. He called it again. No response. The judge glanced over the case and said, "People unable to proceed. Case dismissed. Watch your speed." I left the courtroom feeling a load was lifted, and joined the other celebrating ex-offenders in the corridor.

As I walked back to my car I realized that I had won in a number of ways:
The charges were dropped and my $77 fine would be returned
No points would be put on my license
My insurance premiums would not go up
I wouldn't have to spend the money or time on traffic school
All of these benefits were the result of taking the time to go to traffic court.

Several days later a friend of mine had a different experience in court. So far this year my friend has beat two tickets and lost two. The two tickets he successfully challenged were for speeding based on radar and were given to him by California Highway Patrol; the two he lost were from city police departments for non-speeding moving violations. In this particular case he was ticketed for failure to come to a complete stop at a stop sign. He went to court in West Los Angeles and waited for the entire afternoon for the chance to argue his case.

My friend reported that the judge in his courtroom was like a flamboyant game show host. When he ruled in favor of the driver, he seemed to share in the excitement of the moment by boisterously proclaiming, "Looks like you won't be going to traffic school! And we'll even be mailing you your money back!" But when he ruled against the motorist he became sarcastic and abrupt.

The order of the events in the trials were:
The officer described the circumstances under which he issued the ticket
The judge asked the officer follow-up questions about the case
The defendant told his or her side of the story
The judge questioned the defendant and referred further questions to the officer
In some cases, the defendant was allowed to tell his story only to discover that the officer had shot a video of the traffic stop. These cases always went against the driver.

When my friend was stopped he had asked the police officer: "Are you saying that I blew off the stop sign completely?" The officer said, "No. You just rolled through it." But in court the cop told a different story.

The officer described the location where he was parked and stated that he had an unobstructed view of the intersection. He then told the judge that my friend had gone through the stop sign at 15 mph. The judge then asked, "What's the error factor in your speed estimation certification?" The officer said it was "plus or minus 3 mph."

When it came time to issue a ruling, this judge used this fact against my friend. He said, "Assume for a minute that the officer had been having a bad day. That still means you were going at least 9 mph. Suppose he was having a really, really bad day. That still means you were going 6 miles an hour."

My friend felt that he had learned an important lesson from this trip to court. Since the police officer presents his side of the story first, you should try to anticipate what he will say and create your strategy accordingly. Clearly, this officer had presented what he thought would be an ironclad story to refute someone trying to say that they didn't "roll" through the intersection. If he had said that my friend had gone through the intersection at 5 mph without stopping, that 3 mph variation in his speed estimation certification would be cutting it pretty close.

This brought up another important point. Walter Meyer, a traffic school instructor and freelance writer who lives in San Diego, Calif., said that if the case hinges on your word versus the police officer, the judge will usually rule in favor of the officer. This is because police officers are perceived as experts in traffic rules. Furthermore, Meyer said, "The judge knows that he can walk out the door of the courthouse and find a dozen people breaking the traffic laws." This leads to an attitude of "guilty until proven innocent" — at least in traffic court.

This was echoed by my friend who had some advice for anyone going to try his or her case in traffic court: "Make sure your case is based on concrete evidence and don't rely strictly on what the officer said at the time of the traffic stop. Don't just go in there and say, 'I didn't do it.'"

For example, one woman who successfully challenged her ticket convinced the judge that the stop sign she supposedly ran was resting on a concrete pylon that was too low to see. She brought photos to court to show the judge and her case was dismissed.

Although my case was dismissed, I still had one important step. Experts advise that you contact the DMV and get a copy of your driving record to make sure your dismissed case hasn't inadvertently wound up on your license. While the clerical error is the court's fault, you could be the one spending a night in jail.

As my friend and I discussed our experiences we agreed that there was very little reason not to go to traffic court. There was some chance that the officer wouldn't show up and your case would be dismissed. If the officer did appear, you could always opt for traffic school at the last minute. Furthermore, some speeding tickets (most notably radar tickets) can be challenged on a technicality. Other tickets can be dismissed by presenting evidence such as diagrams or photographs.

It's important to take a larger view of this whole subject. The police write many tickets knowing that the motorist will simply pay their fine by mail hoping to put the whole incident behind them. Other offenders will choose traffic school. Only a small group of motorists will ask for a trial in traffic court. And an even smaller number will actually go to trial.

Clearly, if everyone went to traffic court, the system would become overburdened and collapse. So, if you feel your ticket was unwarranted, ask for your day in court — you could walk out a winner.
 

·
Dim Bulb
Joined
·
3,499 Posts
I wanna make note here, that judges do NOT look fondly upon summoning the ticketing officer into trial. Judges think it is THE biggest waste of an officer's time to be fighting a contesting speeding ticket, and by summoning the officer you're automatically putting the judge into a very pissy mood.

I know in WA state, there's a court rule that states courts have to have certification records for all radar units on file. If the certification isn't on hand, or isn't current, it's ground for non-commital.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,361 Posts
I beat my last two tickets in the birdie by going to court.


Walked out 900 + dolalars richer; a 600 dollar insurance increase avoided and the 300 in ticket violations... :D

ALWAYS GO TO COURT; EVEN IF YOU ARE WRONG...

What's the worst that could happen; You get an extra 3 weeks to 3 Months to pay off the fine. :D
 

·
Dim Bulb
Joined
·
3,499 Posts
DMcBrideBoston said:
I beat my last two tickets in the birdie by going to court.


Walked out 900 + dolalars richer; a 600 dollar insurance increase avoided and the 300 in ticket violations... :D

ALWAYS GO TO COURT; EVEN IF YOU ARE WRONG...

What's the worst that could happen; You get an extra 3 weeks to 3 Months to pay off the fine. :D
Not necessarily, in our state if you fail your trial, you have to walk out and pay on the spot. Question is though, what did you use to beat your tickets and what were they?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,361 Posts
We have to pay on the spot too; I meant the months/weeks leading up to your trial.

Tickets were:

Crossing Solid Line when making left hand turn

and

9% window Tint Violation.

Beat them both by taking pictures of scene and my car without tint on front two windows.

Dave
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
252 Posts
I am actually going to traffic court tomorrow afternoon at 2:30 PM. I got a $205 speeding ticket. The officer threw my liscense and registration at me. He was wrong and I didn't like the way he treated me. ( I was doing 65 in a 55) No posted signs. The officer said I was doing 70. He was sitting on the side of the road and then jumped out and pulled me over.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,546 Posts
yeah I'm going to court on Nov 9th for a 82 in a 60... he was parked in the middle of the interstate in those stupid turn arounds... I had just switched lanes to pass someone and the guy int eh fast lane in front of me quickly pulled over into the slow lane and the state trooper was sitting right there... needless to say I got pulled.
 

·
Dim Bulb
Joined
·
3,499 Posts
DMcBrideBoston said:
Beat them both by taking pictures of scene and my car without tint on front two windows.

Dave
Okay I get the windows pic, but how did taking the pic of the yellow lines get you out of the ticket?
 

·
Dim Bulb
Joined
·
3,499 Posts
DMcBrideBoston said:
The police officer said I crossed them, and the pics I showed the clerk, showed there was no way I crossed them; as there was a big median in the road which I would have had to hit to cross them....
LOL, yeah I could definately see how those would help out. Unfortunately for my current speeding ticket, I don't think a pic can help. Granted he tagged me around a bend in the road, but I was the ONLY one on the road
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
252 Posts
DMcBrideBoston said:
I wouldn't use that as your defense... :D

Dave
Nope. I got a lawyer. I freeze up in court and I really can't talk. The lawyer was only 40 bucks, and if he doesn't get me off, they give me my money back. Alot cheaper than 205. :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
744 Posts
i also suggest a lawyer and wear suit & tie, it looks much, much better, and in some places if you have councel they will call you up first so you don't have to waste more time sitting in court
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
331 Posts
I'm sure most people know this but another advantage of going to court is the judge may reduce your fine especially if you have no other violations. I got a ticket several years ago for I think 70 in a 55 zone. I think the fine on the ticket was around $150 or so. When I went to court, the trooper presented his side and I could not find any technicalities or discrepancies so I pled guilty when the judge asked how I plead. Then he asked me what other violations were on my record to which I replied none. Since I had no other violations, he reduced my fine to $70+court costs and probation for three years. I replied "Thank you your honor" (must always be polite and not loose your composure) and walked out of the court room. I think I paid in total $90 and have not received any other moving (or otherwise) violations since then.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,544 Posts
JoelBender said:
...Clearly, if everyone went to traffic court, the system would become overburdened and collapse.....
Hmmmm. even if you are guilty go to court? I wonder how long it would take for the cops to get tired of spending their days off in court "prosecuting" traffic violations. Considering most departments complain about being undermanned as it is I bet it would sure reduce the number sitting on the side of the road with their radar guns tuned up if every ticket they wrote showed up in front of the judge.
 

·
Heavily Medicated Crime Fighter
Joined
·
2,073 Posts
There is a member on this site that was with me when I came flying around a corner showing off how the cat handles and damn is there was not a cop across the street. Anyway I got a ticket for unreasonable noise and off to court I went. I beat the ticket but my defense was a little unusual LOL

I am three wins for three tickets so far.

Ring on in Frank :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
744 Posts
just to note, some cities do not require the police officer to show up in court, if i remember correctly, philly is one such city.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,557 Posts
tomaso12 said:
i also suggest a lawyer and wear suit & tie, it looks much, much better, and in some places if you have councel they will call you up first so you don't have to waste more time sitting in court
Yep. Did that when I went to court for distributing to minors. 5 counts, and 2 counts endangering a child. My lawyer got me a deal, so I plead guilty to one count distributing. Got 1yr. probation and 80 hrs. community service. A lot better than jail time. $1500+ for the lawyer. Got the community service done in under a month, since I lost my job and had nothing else to do, and I've been "a good boy" so I only have 8 months probation. So at $30 a month, that helps out a ton.

I was the nicest dressed person there. I spent more time running back and forth for papers paying for the court fees than I did at the trial. That's another nice thing about the lawyers. I didn't even have to get on the stand because they reached an agreement. About all I said was, "Yes sir."

If you're a minor drinking, at least be smart about it. Go home or to a safe place to drink. Don't be out on someone else's property when you have no right to be there. Don't be driving. And if you're distributing, heaven forbid, never let more than one person know about the sale, because sometimes the people with your friend may be a snitch. Only person I buy alcohol for is my almost 21 brother who has been drinking since before I ever did (week before I turned 21, which I almost got pulled over but I wasn't really drunk).

Stuff can happen that can ruin your life, or something may happen that you'll regret doing for the rest of your life. So just think of that before you do something stupid. And I just pay the fines, because I figure, I have done a bunch of stuff before and haven't gotten caught, so I guess I deserve it this time.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Top