No kidding! Thanks for the info.Despite... the ghetto english
Double checked my info...the change is mid 2002, not mid 2001 like I thought.bmac said:
No kidding! Thanks for the info.
So just to be sure get the steeda U/P's for a 96-01 Mustang GT.
Most kits will have full charge rpm listed. Most are around 1000rpms. The only way to get in trouble would to sit and idle you car for a long period of time with a big stereo booming.UltraChicken said:My assumption is that underdriving the alternator is bad because you are getting a lower charge from it. Am I right or is this idea just an old mechanics tale? And if so does anyone know of a low spin alternator?
Josh
its funny you mention that, because when i compared my March alternator pully to the stock one, there was NO difference. too tired to know for sure, but i think that if you spin the crank quicker, it will have to spin the alternator slower, hence the lower speed, but im not positive on that and i dont feel like checkingJurgen said:i havet got my pulleys yet but people say that theres not a big difference in size
so it shouldt be a big problem and i have seen em so i dont know y they sell the ALT
pulley
a smaller crank pulley leads to slower belt speed, which will make everything spin slower. to keep something spinning the same speed per RPM as before you must replace it with an equal ratio pulley as the crank. So if the new crank pulley is 20% smaller, to keep the alt spped the same the new alt pulley needs to be 20% smaller.J-Rob said:
its funny you mention that, because when i compared my March alternator pully to the stock one, there was NO difference. too tired to know for sure, but i think that if you spin the crank quicker, it will have to spin the alternator slower, hence the lower speed, but im not positive on that and i dont feel like checking