TCCoA Forums banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,758 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Yes, I'm going to install 2.73's in my Cougar. Yes, I know it will be slow. Yes, I'm going for fuel economy. :D

Anyway: 95 4R70W needs what speedometer gear to get the speedometer close to being accurate?!?! :2huh:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,758 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I had already found that page and came up with a 16.3 tooth (235/60/16 (27") tire).

I just wasn't 100% sure the 4R70W had the 8 tooth or the 7 tooth drive gear.

Thanks. :thumbsup:

Now, have a part number. :D :leftright :rofl:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,548 Posts
Well, with the taller tires, now you need a 14.3 tooth gear. Closest that Ford offers is a 16 tooth for an auto. trans. D0AZ 17271 B. On a manual trans. application, you could change the drive gear on the output shaft. But on the 4R70W, that gear is a machined part of the shaft.


cheers
Ed N.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,548 Posts
94 Daily Driven 4.6L said:
Yes, I'm going to install 2.73's in my Cougar. Yes, I know it will be slow. Yes, I'm going for fuel economy. :D
Keep in mind that a lower numeric ratio will not always improve fuel economy. You may end up giving it more throttle to get the car going. Or end up with revs at highway speed being too low in OD, that the engine is lugging and working harder than if it was running a few hundred rpm higher. Food for thought anyway. ;)

cheers
Ed N.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
155 Posts
Also keep in mind that with the wide ratio trans and 2.73:1, first gear is still noticably steeper than an AOD's 1st gear with 3.27:1 gears.

If you do mainly highway driving, it may work out ok.

Jeramie
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,758 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
fast Ed N said:
Keep in mind that a lower numeric ratio will not always improve fuel economy. You may end up giving it more throttle to get the car going. Or end up with revs at highway speed being too low in OD, that the engine is lugging and working harder than if it was running a few hundred rpm higher. Food for thought anyway. ;)

cheers
Ed N.
I agree 100%. But most (95%) of my driving is at 78 mph and I'm getting around 24/25 mpg now. If I slow it down to 65 mph I have gotten a best of about 28 mpg. So my logic is keep the speed, but lower the rpm's slightly. If my driving was normally at 65 mph then yes I agree that the engine would be lugging and I would loose gas mileage. :beek:

All I can do is give it a try. I'm still shooting for 35 - 40 mpg, but it will be VERY difficult. (If I can break 30 on a regular basis I'll be happy). But I think with a "MPG" tune and the 2.73's, 30's are definitely possible. :D

My “goal” is 35 – 40 mpg highway and 15.9999 or faster in the 1/4 mile. :beek:
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top